Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Footwear to go with our jackets

Pandemic

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,380
Location
Witless Protection
IMG_4369.jpeg



Guess who finally got off the fence and made a decision to order boots (except in 8”) :)
 
Last edited:

Pandemic

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,380
Location
Witless Protection
Beautiful! What brand?
Briselblack. I was tempted by the cool leathers and the 55 last from Nick’s, but ultimately the profile of their boot (and the other PNW engineer boots) just looks a bit meh to me. Briselblack are more influenced by the Japanese style of sleek engineer boots. This will be my second pair from them, so I kinda know what to expect
 

One Drop

A-List Customer
Messages
474
Location
Swiss Alps
I know opinion on Rose Anvil is quite divided but just today he released a video on a new pair of Russel moccasins he got. They are heavy duty bison leather with a more standard vibram sole and his view was they are almost as sturdy as heritage red wings or PNW. The moc construction still gives them a little more flex but they were way sturdier than other Russell models. His opinion was based on leather choice and sole you can definitely build yourself a pretty sturdy pair.

I just saw this now as I was searching for an old post of mine about my Russell Moccasin Backcountrys that I wanted to update. I was also grateful for his video showing what the beefier models are like, as my own are not suitable for high altitude rocky terrain also for lower temperatures. I'll eventially get a pair of Big Cambos when my Hanwags can no longer be resoled.

This issues of stability and firmness vs. flexibility and lack of structure all kind of go out the window with these boots, unless you are referring to specific issues and needs such as a more structured sole for crossing scree and boulder fields, or the need for more foot protection via lining of the quarters, as examples. In real life use the wide, low, flat platform of the midsole / sole combined with the torsional flexibility of the sole and the flexibility of the upper boot construction at the ankle and forefoot actually create a far more stable base to walk on on flat terrain, and a firmer grip on the ground when side-hilling, and climbing and descending steeper terrain. Your feet and ankle do do more work that when locked into a traditional hiking, tactical, or hunting boot, but your feet and legs quickly adjust and feel far more comfortable than with normal boots, and far less tired and cramped at the end of the day. The difference is amazing, I admit to having been skeptical at first but am fully convinced now of the advantages of this kind of design and construction.
 

One Drop

A-List Customer
Messages
474
Location
Swiss Alps
Here’s the exact pair from the video I mentioned. If you notice the weight they are just under PNW models. As it says the model name is the South 40. Heavy bison hide, vibram sole. It’s thier most heavy duty stock model. You can do some customizing of their various models and maybe make something up; but off the shelf this is their heavy duty model

That and the Big Cambo are their most heavy duty models, but the two are different in what is beefed up or not, and would, I imagine, suit very different usages.

For the highest waterproofness and ruggedness, and leg protection from brush at lower altitudes I would assume the South 40 to be the right choice, for higher altitude hiking and trekking, wearing a pack, and more warmth, I'd assume the Big Cambo is the better choice. I'll definitely be replacing my all leather Hanwags with a pair of Big Cambos when I can no longer resole the Hanwags, my Backcountrys are superb for most things I do but not for certain high mountain hikes and treks, and for lower temperatures.
 

DweezilMac

One of the Regulars
Messages
106
Location
Switzerland
That and the Big Cambo are their most heavy duty models, but the two are different in what is beefed up or not, and would, I imagine, suit very different usages.

For the highest waterproofness and ruggedness, and leg protection from brush at lower altitudes I would assume the South 40 to be the right choice, for higher altitude hiking and trekking, wearing a pack, and more warmth, I'd assume the Big Cambo is the better choice. I'll definitely be replacing my all leather Hanwags with a pair of Big Cambos when I can no longer resole the Hanwags, my Backcountrys are superb for most things I do but not for certain high mountain hikes and treks, and for lower temperatures.
Thank you for the thorough analysis and excellent write-up!
Much appreciated!
 

TartuWolf

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,580
Location
Tartu, Estonia
I'll post in this thread as well separately.
I've mentioned Sendra 13416 here and there in the past praising them.
I've had my size 41 pair for quite a few years now and as much as I love them they are just a tiny bit too small.
But 42-43 have always been out of stock everywhere, especially the black ones.
The brown ones look super nice as well, but I want my rugged lugged beater engineers to be black.
Recently trendbereich in Germany restocked on the black ones in size 42-43.
Pretty good price at 220eur per pair.
Great shipping price at 16eu to Estonia. Compare that to buying from Sendra directly or from shop-boots - they want over 50eur for shipping a pair, which is nuts.
And trendbereich offers free returns, even from Estonia!
So I grabbed both 42 and 43 for assurance.
Today they came and my fears/doubts about Sendra *******t sizing were correct - their current 42 EU is the same size as my old 41. Sendra at some point were even signifying "Spain" and "EU" sizing separately. For example a had a pair that was 41 "Spain", 42 "EU", 8 UK and 9 US. Talk about confusing.
And since my pair is simply "41" without any specification I guess it's "Spain" 41.
I contacted Sendra support to get info about sizing but they are completely useless. Every single time I've ever talked to Sendra support it has been disappointing.
Anyway, I'm glad that the 43 fit me rather well, especially with an insert, so I'll be keeping them.
According to the box 42EU = 8UK = 8.5US and 43EU = 9UK = 9.5US. Such weird sizing...
Here are some shots of my old 41 (???) next to the new 43 EU ones.
Note that the photo angle exaggerates the last shape from above, it's not that drastic of a difference in person, but there does seem to be a slight difference.
1746882042934.png

1746882049494.png

1746882057016.png

1746882064048.png


1746882071663.png
 

MrProper

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,140
Location
Europe
I've always found the Waldviertler a bit special. Pretty cool on the one hand, a bit "alternative" and a bit ugly on the other.
But via a diversion with barefoot shoes and Waldviertler trainers, I made friends with them.
They go really well with jeans.
You just have to break them in quickly, because the older/worn they are, the cooler they look.
IMG_6251.jpeg IMG_6253.jpeg IMG_6223.jpeg
 

Edward

Bartender
Messages
26,331
Location
London, UK
Every airport makes me take my shoes off ☹️

Pretty standard the last twenty plus years - it's why I switched to wearing slip-ons when I fly. Though a lot of the time in the last few years I've just been waved on with those. I assume it's the low profile sole and nowhere really to hide stuff (versus a boot). I think it's to do with the newer scanners being so much better. Certainly not having to empty my bag at security these days is proving to be a joy.


Don´t know why, but I found these "used once" for cheap and needed to have them. Not even sure which outfit I can wear with them...

Bowen THETFORD BI MATIERE (stormwelted with Harris Tweed)
View attachment 699095


I had a pair of shoes like this about fifteen years ago. I loved them, but they died when I left them in the hall for a few weeks and a carpet beetle got to them and ate all the tweed!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
114,684
Messages
3,180,097
Members
58,535
Latest member
AlitlCrow
Top