The $77 A-Shirt

[flat-top]

http://customshirt1.com/ZM207_01All.htm
As seen on Hugh Jackman in Wolverine.

 

[Feraud]

There's a sucker born every day.
I wonder how many they've sold.

 

[Baron Kern]

not going to lie, I rather like the way the shirt looks with the undies. And the low hip briefs look really nice as well.

sometimes the money is well spent on something unique...i think(?)

 

[Geesie]

I'm fairly certain that I and 99.9997% of the population cannot tell the difference between this and Hanes.

 

[Tomasso]

I'm fairly certain that I and 99.9997% of the population cannot tell the difference between this and Hanes.

Well, that's if you can't tell the difference between cashmere and burlap. Were Zimmerli to occupy the same price point as Hanes, the latter would go out of business.

 

[Geesie]

If you think that this cotton is $76 nicer for undershirt use than plebian cotton, more power to you.

 

[Tomasso]

There was no mention of price in your previous statement.

 

[Baron Kern]

There was no mention of price in your previous statement.

<3

 

[KenDale]

While the undershirt looks great, it is not going to make me look like Hugh Jackman. I will stick with my Hanes athletic undershirts and make the best of what I have (or don't have).

 

[theinterchange]

That is seriously disgusting...

Randy

 

[MrBern]

Spanx for Men

Women have worn slimming undergarments for years, now manufacturers are successfully going after the male market.

https://www.getslimtsnow.com/fl

http://www.spanx.com/category/index.jsp?categoryId=4016113&cp=4017325

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/30/fashion/30spanx.html

Its robust sales are even more remarkable considering that Equmen isn’t cheap: tanks are $89, T-shirts up to $109. By contrast, Spanx’s men’s undershirts go for $58, its tanks for $55. The body-sculpturing tops from Ript Fusion are $58 to $62.

 

[theinterchange]

Women have worn slimming undergarments for years, now manufacturers are successfully going after the male market.

The problem for men and "slimming" garments is their arms will look even punier if they're not very muscular. [huh] Sort of like men wearing those skin tight Under Armour shirts and chicken leg arms...

Randy

 

[shortbow]

The A shirt I'm wearing now sells two for $12. Can't see any difference with the one pictured. Who has so much money that they'd pay $75 for an undershirt? You'd have to be on drugs or something. Crikey.

 

[Talbot]

Thanks!

$77 white garbo?

Nothing like a good chuckle to start your day.

T

 

[Richard Warren]

I don't see the point or problem. If I was going to wear wife beaters, I would probably get nice ones.