I currently own a peacoat from the 80s made of melton wool by Sterlingwear in a size 40L. It fits well in the body, but was a bit short in the arms so a tailor let out the sleeve hems and I gained about a inch in length. As I mentioned, I have been on a quest for a kersey wool peacoat in a size 40L or, possibly, a 40XL. I have long arms and I don't know if it would be better to buy a 40L again and have the sleeves lengthened or buy a 40XL, which would be fine in the arms, but too long in the body, and have the bottom hem taken up. The risk with the 40L is that the wear from the previous hem would be visible, especially on a vintage coat. The risk with the 40XL is that raising the bottom hem might throw off the proportions or alter the button stance. Any thoughts?Not necessarily. The Navy could have changed the contract during the year. But it probably did not. Letting contracts and taking bids is time consuming. And for that contract there was probably only one company awarded the contract. If the Navy needed high volume that couldn't be supplied by one contractor, others might be awarded the work, but I think that would normally be unusual.


