Lenore
Practically Family
- Messages
- 759
- Location
- Houston, Texas
Lauren said:I wasn't quite sure where to post this, but here's a scan of stockings from a catalog from Winter 1939-1940.
I'm in lust over those .79 ones in the top right corner...
Lauren said:I wasn't quite sure where to post this, but here's a scan of stockings from a catalog from Winter 1939-1940.
Inky said:if you are ambitious and have a serger here's a tutorial on making your own seamed stockings:
http://vivianvondimples.blogspot.com/
Lorelai99 said:This is probably not where this should go so sorry if not but I have a question for those of you that dress vintage all the time.
I'm going to an outdoor event (WWII), and it's usually pretty hot and this is my first time actually dressing for all day (besides my hair and I figure I'd look less "odd" if I dress for the hair instead of just throwing on a modern sundress with 1940s hair!!!) and not just the event at night. What would have been the "norm" on stockings during the day?
Lady Day said:That part I know.
I just personally cant believe these can be from '43. lol Silk stocking from the war time!? AHHHHHHH!!
LD
John Lofgren Monkey Boots Shinki Horsebuttt - $1,136 The classic monkey boot silhouette in an incredibly rich Shinki russet horse leather.
Grant Stone Diesel Boot Dark Olive Chromexcel - $395 Goodyear welted, Horween Chromexcel, classic good looks.
Schott 568 Vandals Jacket - $1,250 The classic Perfecto motorcycle jacket, in a very special limited-edition Schott double rider style. fortworthgal said:I paid less than $1/pair. You can all hate me now. lol
missjoeri said:Depends on age, location, even religion or social background.
Generally though women wouldnt' be caught dead without stockings in Europe except at suitable locations like the beach or park.
But during the war this changed, stockings became hard to find and fashion tried to convince girls and women to go out in socks or kneesocks in stead of stockings.
For most of the war most women would try to wear stockings anyway while younger girls had less problems moving on to socks.
But at the beginning it was seen as poverty and unfetching, so women preferred stockings and would rather paint their legs with drawn on seams then walk around with bare legs or socks.
A elderly northern european lady told me that the first time she went outside without stockings in the street she felt the same as if they had told her to go outside *******.
Personally I never ever go out without wearing stockings.
Lorelai99 said:Thanks for the info! I'm gonna assume it wasn't much different in the US???
LizzieMaine said:Similar, but not quite as rigid. Here, it often was a matter of age and social class -- a middle-aged (in those days that meant about 35-50), middle-class lady would no more go into town with bare legs than she would dance naked in the streets, but a younger woman, or a working-class woman wouldn't worry as much about it -- she'd feel perfectly at home in bobby socks and saddle shoes instead of hose and heels. Leg makeup was around, but most women didn't like it -- it often looked cakey and if it was hot out, it'd melt off and get all over car seats, furniture, and clothing.
Sheer nylons in wartime would be saved for special occasions -- the everyday hosiery for women would be service-weight nylons if she had them, otherwise rayon or cotton. There were active propaganda efforts toward making cotton stockings fashionable for dressy occasions, but most women didn't buy it.
Lastex-topped knee-high stockings were also popular if you could get them -- they were much more comfortable in the heat of summer than full length hose. It was also common in warm weather to roll down long stockings to just below the knee, using homemade loops of elastic to hold them up, and relying on the length of one's skirt to keep them covered. Obviously this didn't work with the really shortish wartime dresses.